ShareThis Page
$1.1B Pittsburgh airport project falls flat with some residents |

$1.1B Pittsburgh airport project falls flat with some residents

Theresa Clift
| Tuesday, February 20, 2018 7:30 p.m

A resident attended an Allegheny County Council meeting Tuesday to urge county leaders hold a public hearing before continuing to plan a massive $1.1 billion airport project, and he claims to have the backing of nearly 150 residents.

John DeFazio, council president, said the council does not have any jurisdiction over the airport and that no county funds are being used for the project. He suggested the residents instead take their comments to the Allegheny County Airport Authority board.

David Allinder of Green Tree said he has been talking to the public about his concerns since September, when the airport announced the project . At that time, Allegheny County Airport Authority CEO Christina Cassotis told the Trib that the airport and airline officials made the decision to build the new terminal without public input.

The authority has since held three public meetings to collect public input on the desired features for the new terminal.

Nearly 150 people said they were interested in a Facebook group Allinder started, called “Demand a public meeting on the airport teardown,” but none others showed up to the meeting in time to give a comment.

“The idea of spending that much money to tear down the majority of a 25-year-old building, reduce it in size, and the idea we can actually save all this money and not raise landing fees sounds a bit outlandish to me,” Allinder said.

The airport’s fee it charges airlines, known collectively as the cost per enplanement, was $12.85 per departing passenger in 2017. After the new terminal opens in 2023, the airport plans a lower fee of $9.73 per departing passenger .

The fee is one factor airlines consider in deciding where to add service.

Bond money will be used to finance most of the project’s $1.1 billion cost, not local tax dollars, Cassotis said.

Allinder worries that if the bonds are not paid off on time, the taxpayers could be stuck paying for them, he said.

Sam DeMarco, R-North Fayette, defended the project.

“For what it’s worth, I believe this is a great project for Allegheny County, it’s going to move us forward and tax dollars are not at risk,” DeMarco said.

Allinder’s group is also asking for an independent review of the project and for the airport to put a hold on all project expenses until the public hearing is held, he said.

An independent review is not necessary, DeMarco told Allinder after the meeting.

The airport authority in January hired Orlando-based R.W. Block Consulting to work on the project for $1.09 million in the first year.

The authority also is paying Chicago-based consultant Ricondo & Associates Inc. $7.6 million to develop the master plan.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669, or via Twitter @tclift.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Theresa at 412-380-5669, or via Twitter .

A rendering of the redesigned Pittsburgh International Airport at night.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.