2 Pittsburgh companies rank high on LinkedIn’s top startups list |

2 Pittsburgh companies rank high on LinkedIn’s top startups list

Aurora Innovation puts a Lincoln equipped with its self-driving technology on display during an open house at its Pittsburgh office in June 2018.

Two self-driving car companies in Pittsburgh cracked the top 20 of LinkedIn’s ranking of top startups in the United States.

Aurora Innovation checked in at No. 9 and Argo AI ranked No. 17 in the list released Thursday by the employment website, which says it has 575 million users.

An article accompanying LinkedIn’s list described Pittsburgh as a “white-collar talent magnet with the research hubs, cultural delights and manageable housing costs that startups cherish.”

LinkedIn said about 17 percent of Argo’s 350 employees studied at either the University of Pittsburgh or Carnegie Mellon University, and company CEO Bryan Salesky has degrees from both. The Strip District-based company landed a $1 billion investment from Ford Motors shortly after launching operations in December 2016.

Aurora, which has about 160 employees, is based locally in Pittsburgh’s Lawrenceville neighborhood and has California offices in San Francisco and Palo Alto. Co-founder and CEO Chris Urmson, who LinkedIn said has been listed as an inventor on more than 60 patents, earned a Ph.D. from Carnegie Mellon.

In 2007, Salesky and Urmson helped lead a Carnegie Mellon team that collaborated with General Motors to victory in the DARPA Urban Grand Challenge , a 60-mile driverless car race.

Tom Fontaine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at [email protected] or via Twitter @FontainePGH.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.