2 Pittsburgh women charged with trying to smuggle 28 pounds of cocaine into the U.S. |

2 Pittsburgh women charged with trying to smuggle 28 pounds of cocaine into the U.S.


Two Pittsburgh women were arrested Tuesday by U.S. Customs agents at the Cyril E. King Airport in St. Thomas allegedly attempting to smuggle 28.6 pounds of cocaine to the U.S. mainland, according to federal authorities.

U.S. Attorney for the Virgin Islands Gretchen Shappert said Ngoc Nguyen, 21, and Fendi Brooks, 25, both from Pittsburgh, were charged with conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute 13 kilograms of cocaine and possession with the intent to distribute cocaine.

The pair made their first appearance before Magistrate Judge Ruth Miller in St. Thomas and were detained pending further proceedings, Shappert reported.

According to the complaint, Nguyen and Brooks were stopped by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers at the airport after they discovered that Nguyen and Brooks were attempting to smuggle cocaine through the airport to the U.S. mainland in their checked luggage.

Shappert said in a news release that the white powdery substance, discovered in a suitcase, field-tested positive for cocaine and weighed approximately 13 kilograms.

If convicted, Nguyen and Brooks each face anywhere from 10 years to life in prison and a fine of $10 million on each count.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.