ShareThis Page
2015 Heinz Awards honor authors, humanitarians and healers |

2015 Heinz Awards honor authors, humanitarians and healers

The Associated Press
| Thursday, April 23, 2015 12:01 a.m
Cartoonist Roz Chast is the recipient of the 2015 Heinz Award for arts and humanities.
dave lauridsen
Jacob Wood and William McNulty are the joint recipients of the 2015 Heinz Award for human condition.
Sangeeta Bhatia is the recipient of the 2015 Heinz Award for technology, the economy and employment.
Aaron Wolf is the recipient of the 2015 Heinz Award for public policy.
Frederica Perera is the recipient of the 2015 Heinz Award for environment.

Longtime cartoonist Roz Chast drew on the emotionally draining experience of caring for her aging parents during their final days to produce an evocative memoir that just helped nab her a $250,000 prize.

“If I can get through it, anybody can get through it,” said Chast, a cartoonist for The New Yorker since 1978 who will discuss her book Thursday night in Oakland at an event hosted by the Mt. Lebanon-based Family Hospice & Palliative Care. “It’s hard and it’s sad, and there are moments that it’s funny, too.”

She is one of six individuals sharing $1.25 million in prize money as recipients of the 2015 Heinz Awards.

Chast, 60, of Connecticut clinched the competition’s arts and humanities category with her “genius for finding humor and a shared humanity” in daily life.

The Heinz Awards accepts anonymous nominations from a pool of 500 people with expertise across five award categories.

“The nominators are tasked with finding people who are doing amazing, excellent work in their fields, figuring out how to address the challenges that face our society in various ways and coming up with solutions that others can replicate,” said Grant Oliphant, president of The Heinz Endowments, a separate entity from the Heinz Family Foundation. He helped with the latest round of Heinz Awards at the request of Teresa Heinz, who formed the Heinz Family Foundation in 1993 to honor her late husband, U.S. Sen. John Heinz.

Foundation staff whittled hundreds of nominations down to a group of finalists, Oliphant said. Then a jury of 12 experts selected the winners.

Here are the 2015 recipients in the remaining categories:

• Environment — Frederica Perera of New York, founder and director of Columbia University Center for Children’s Environmental Health, for her research examining long-term health problems tied to prenatal and childhood exposure to hazardous chemicals.

• Human condition — William McNulty and Jacob Wood, both of Los Angeles and former Marines, for founding Team Rubicon. The humanitarian aid organization has deployed emergency response teams made up of veterans to disaster zones in 11 countries. The 25,000-volunteer network in the United States is being modeled in Norway, Australia and the United Kingdom.

• Public policy — Aaron Wolf of Oregon, a geoscientist and professor at Oregon State University, for his work promoting peace, human security and sustainability by negotiating disputes over shared bodies of water, including international talks in Southeast Asia and Africa and domestic dialogue over the U.S.-Canada Columbia River Treaty.

• Technology, the economy and employment — Sangeeta Bhatia of Massachusetts for her breakthrough in developing artificial human “micro-livers” used to screen drugs for toxicity, and for her work developing simpler, more affordable cancer screening tools.

The Heinz Family Foundation has doled out more than $21 million in prize money to 123 individuals over the award program’s 20-year history. For details, visit

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.