ShareThis Page
Allegheny County Airport Authority’s former president exits with $186K deal |

Allegheny County Airport Authority’s former president exits with $186K deal

Bobby Kerlik
| Wednesday, April 23, 2014 11:09 p.m

The Allegheny County Airport Authority will pay its ousted former president $51,245 for unused vacation and sick time.

The payment is in addition to $134,375 the agency agreed to pay Brad Penrod in severance, bringing his total exit package to $185,620 plus 18 months of medical benefits.

The agency released the payment record for 497 hours of unused time in response to an open records request from the Tribune-Review. The unused vacation sick time payout was part of his contract.

The authority board forced out Penrod, 53, of North Fayette last month amid a push from County Executive Rich Fitzgerald for more flights to and from the airport. Penrod was paid $214,465 annually.

The board appointed James Gill as interim executive director. Gill, 46, of Moon was executive vice president.

Penrod’s attorney, Dennis Unkovic, said the payments settle any issues between his client and the authority.

Airport Authority board Treasurer Dennis Davin, who heads the county’s economic development authority, declined to comment.

Penrod became CEO in 2007 after working in a number of operations roles beginning in 1983. His separation agreement states that he “is being let go through no fault of his own.” Penrod agreed not to sue as a part of the deal, and both sides agreed not to make disparaging comments about each other.

Penrod has not yet applied for his pension, but his attorney said he intends to.

Pittsburgh International Airport last year posted its lowest annual passenger total since opening in 1992, according to airport data.

Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7886 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.