ShareThis Page
Allegheny County pays $1.15M settlement in ex-jail major’s age discrimination case |

Allegheny County pays $1.15M settlement in ex-jail major’s age discrimination case

| Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:27 p.m
Allegheny County Jail

Allegheny County paid a $1.15 million settlement to a former major at the Allegheny County Jail who says he was fired because of his age and for using the Family Medical Leave Act.

Walter Mikulan, 62, of Hampton was fired in August 2013 after nearly 30 years without a reason, according to a complaint filed in August 2015 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

Allegheny County officials declined to comment on the settlement.

Jail Warden Orlando Harper began complaining about employees abusing FMLA in 2012, the complaint said.

When Mikulan took days off under FMLA for anxiety and depression the following year, under his doctor’s advice, Harper made negative comments, the complaint said.

Mikulan had to undergo disciplinary hearings for minor infractions, the complaint said.

After he was fired, Mikulan was replaced with “younger, less qualified men,” the complaint said.

County jail officials have a history of targeting older employees with discipline, frequent shift changes and other harassing behavior in an attempt to “force them into retirement,” the complaint said.

The Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission granted Mikulan a “right to sue” notification.

The $1.15 million settlement will be distributed up this way:

• $432,580 to the law office of Timothy P. O’Brien for attorney’s fees and costs.

• $283,052 to Mikulan as wages.

• $283,052 to Mikulan as payment for claims.

• $151,316 to Stember Cohn & Davidson-Welling, LLC, for attorney’s fees and costs.

The county is making the payment as a result of a federal court jury’s decision in June.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669, or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.