ShareThis Page
Baldwin man who took vets’ money granted early parole for health issues |

Baldwin man who took vets’ money granted early parole for health issues

Matthew Santoni
| Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:15 p.m

A Baldwin Borough man who was convicted of stealing donations meant for veterans’ funerals suffered a stroke in jail and will be released early, a judge ruled Wednesday.

Patrick J. Gorman was found guilty of theft by unlawful taking, receiving stolen property and misapplication of entrusted property after a bench trial in January before Allegheny County Judge David Cashman. Prosecutors said Gorman, a former officer at American Legion Post 935 in Baldwin and VFW Post 1810 in Brentwood, took money intended for an honor guard that would appear at veterans’ funerals and spent more than $40,000 on personal items such as a waterbed and $5,000 paid to South Hills Country Club.

Cashman sentenced Gorman to 11 12 to 23 months.

At a hearing before Cashman on Wednesday, defense attorney Casey White said Gorman, 80, suffered an apparent stroke at the county jail on Sept. 22 and was taken to Allegheny General Hospital. Doctors there confirmed he suffered a stroke but also reported he had heart problems and signs of dementia.

In light of Gorman’s declining health, White asked Cashman to parole his client early.

“I ask for leniency, sympathy, so he can get the proper care he needs on the outside,” White said.

Gorman appeared in court in a wheelchair and did not speak to the judge. He had served about 7 12 months of his sentence.

Cashman granted the early parole but included as a condition that Gorman relinquish clothing, flags, hats, guns or other materials necessary to operate an honor guard.

Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or 412-391-0927.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.