Bishop Zubik says he’s sorry for times ‘I could’ve done more, … said more’ |

Bishop Zubik says he’s sorry for times ‘I could’ve done more, … said more’

Bishop David Zubik greets church-goers following a Holy Hour for Repentance service Sunday at St. Paul Cathedral in Pittsburgh’s Oakland neighborhood. Sept. 24, 2018
Bishop David Zubik speaks during a Holy Hour for Repentance service the homily portion of the special service Sunday at St. Paul Cathedral in Pittsburgh’s Oakland neighborhood.

Diocese of Pittsburgh Bishop David Zubik told those gathered Sunday at a prayer service for children who were sexually abused by priests that he’s sorry for “the times that I could’ve done more, for the times that I could’ve said more.”

“I only wish that hindsight had caught up with me sooner than it did,” Zubik said during the homily portion of the special service at St. Paul Cathedral in Pittsburgh’s Oakland neighborhood. “All of us are called to join in this time of repentance as we feel each other’s pain deeply, within and outside the church.”

Roughly 100 people gathered for the special “Holy Hour for Repentance” service, including a few dozen parishioners, a group of about 20 seminarians — or priests-in-training — and clergy and lay leaders from across the diocese’s six-county region.

Zubik called for the service to “express sorrow” for child sexual abuse victims as Pittsburgh and five other Pennsylvania dioceses respond to a scathing grand jury report alleging that more than 300 priests sexually abused at least 1,000 children over the past 70 years.

“This is a beginning,” said the Rev. Jim Orr, who splits his ministry between St. Aloysius in Reserve Township and Most Holy Name of Jesus, which operates St. Anthony’s Chapel in Pittsburgh’s Troy Hill neighborhood. “There’s no easy answer to pain, and pains like this can take a lifetime to heal. So we can’t even pretend that this is going to be the be-all and end-all of an answer, but certainly it’s a beginning.”

The event marked the start of periodic fasting and special daily prayers by clergy during a “Year of Repentance” that Zubik announcement earlier this month.

In Western Pennsylvania, 20 “predator” priests who worked in the Greensburg diocese and 99 in the Pittsburgh diocese stand accused of sexual abuse in the far-reaching grand jury report made public in August.

“It’s a demonstration on a very public basis that we’re willing to work with those who have been hurt by any member of the church and we want to walk with them,” Orr said shortly after Sunday’s service in Oakland. “Whether they want to walk with us is another question. But we certainly want to be part of their healing.”

Zubik has said the church didn’t cover up the abuse and that the church has instituted internal reforms to address abuse by clergy. He has called for eliminating criminal statutes of limitation for child sexual abuse, clarifying the rules for mandatory reporting and providing stronger penalties for those who fail to protect children.

“We also need to take steps together,” Zubik said Sunday from the pulpit. “We must address the change that must happen within the church and in each of our lives, so that the abuse that has brought us here today will never, ever happen again in any church by any priest or in any place by any person.”

The grand jury report alleges that high-ranking leaders in the church tried to cover-up allegations dating to decades ago, including Cardinal Donald Wuerl, Washington’s archbishop and former bishop of Pittsburgh. The report mentions Wuerl’s name 169 times.

Wuerl has since said it may be best for him to “step aside” so the church can heal and that he plans to discuss his resignation with Pope Francis.

On Sunday at St. Paul’s, the pews of the massive, Gothic-style cathedral — which can seat up to 1,500 — looked relatively empty at the prayer service in comparison to the largest Masses and funerals held there.

The one-hour service, which was not a Mass, included candle lighting, incense burning, multiple readings, responsorial hymns and a prayer by Zubik asking forgiveness from those hurt by the church or its leaders in any way.

“We acknowledge the betrayal of a most sacred trust. We acknowledge their courage in speaking the truth,” the reader said during another prayer. “We affirm their dignity as people who are seeking truth and accountability, compassion and redress for the wrong that has been done to them.”

Tim Lennon, president of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests — which has called for Zubik to resign — has dismissed such efforts as “merely words and gestures,” arguing that “apologies, condemnations (and) penance fail to protect or support victims.”

Last week, Zubik joined other bishops and archbishops in supporting the creation of an independent and voluntary sex abuse survivors “compensation program.”

In the same statement, the leaders said they opposed altering statue of limitations rules in civil cases involving old claims of abuse because doing so could bankrupt Pennsylvania’s Catholic Church.

Zubik has said the church since 2002 has forbidden non-disclosure agreements for child victims of clergy sex abuse and called for the state to create a similar ban.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.