ShareThis Page
Bus changes ahead for Penn Hills district |

Bus changes ahead for Penn Hills district

Michael DiVittorio
| Monday, July 4, 2016 11:00 p.m

Penn Hills School District parents should expect busing changes when classes resume as leaders slash transportation spending and update routes for almost 5,000 students.

The changes occur five years after the district privatized its busing service and struggled with transportation overspending that strained the budget.

“We have an obligation to bus to nonpublic schools that are within a 10-mile distance of the district boundary to that school,” said district technology director Roger Myers, who is helping to set up the routes. “We bus a lot of kids that go to outside schools.”

Letters containing bus stop information with times and locations will go to guardians around Aug. 1. Staffers were designing routes and consulting with the contractor “to maximize efficiency,” Myers said.

The district budgeted about $4.5 million for transportation next school year. The district enrolls about 4,000 students, but is required to transport about 4,800 students. The first day of school is scheduled for Aug. 24.

The board approved working with BME Transit of Penn Hills for 2016-17 and may enlist two other companies, district business Manager Robert Geletko said. The district stopped providing its own busing service June 30, 2011, when the board contracted with First Student Inc. as the transportation provider. The board at the time touted the move as a way to save money. However, there were myriad problems that year, from buses running 45 minutes late to not picking up students after school.

School directors ended the district’s contract with First Student in 2014, opting to sign a five-year deal with AJ Myers & Sons Inc.

That agreement lasted two years after the district overspent on busing and state Auditor General Eugene DePasquale revealed more district transportation problems. The audit report showed the district’s transportation expenditures went from $5.8 million in 2011-12 to $5.5 million in 2012-13, $6 million in 2013-14 and $8 million in 2014-15.

The district’s 2014-15 budget allowed for about $4.6 million in transportation spending for 75 buses, bus monitors and fuel for the vehicles.

However, the district had 99 buses on the first day of school in 2014-15, and 111 buses on the last day of school. That pushed the district $4 million over its transportation budget.

Rosters show that full-size high school buses carried 18 to 67 students, with an average of 47 students per bus.

As for how the district expects not to overspend on transportation next year, Myers said, “Best practices are being used to maximize the return on the state subsidy, while trying to achieve the greatest efficiency in student loads and bus routes.”

The board approved a $82.7 million budget on June 27 with a 1.5-mill tax increase.

The owner of a property with the district’s median home value of $68,800 would pay about $1,810 in property taxes next year — $103 more than 2015-16. Property owners may pay the tax bill over eight months for 2016-17, instead of seven months as they did last year.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2367 or

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.