ShareThis Page
Canonsburg post office to be renamed in honor of Officer Bashioum |

Canonsburg post office to be renamed in honor of Officer Bashioum

Canonsburg police Officer Scott Bashioum
The flag flies at half staff at the Canonsburg Borough Building in memory of Canonsburg officer Scott Leslie Bashioum, 52, who was shot and killed while responding to a domestic violence call earlier that day on Thursday, Nov. 10, 2016.

The Canonsburg post office will be rededicated Monday in honor of slain police Officer Scott Bashioum, making it only the second post office in the state the bear the name of a fallen officer.

A plaque will be unveiled at the post office at 10 a.m. Monday during a special ceremony that will include Bashioum’s parents and other family and friends.

A gunman shot and killed Bashioum, 52, as he and another officer responded to a Nov. 10, 2016, domestic violence call. Michael Cwiklinski killed his estranged wife, Dalia Sabae, and ambushed the two officers before killing himself. The second officer was injured and survived.

The rededication bill was introduced to the U.S. Senate in April 2017 by Sens. Pat Toomey and Bob Casey. It was signed into law in March, officially renaming the post office on West Pike Street the “Police Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office Building.”

The post office in Pittston, Luzerne County, is the only other post office in Pennsylvania bearing the name of a police officer killed in the line of duty. That post office is named for state Trooper Joshua D. Miller, who was killed in 2009 while rescuing a child for a kidnapper, according to a USPS database.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.