ShareThis Page
Catholic Bishop Zubik prays for immigration reform |

Catholic Bishop Zubik prays for immigration reform

| Sunday, November 24, 2013 10:36 p.m
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Antoni Prevosti-Vives, orginally of Spain, and Claudia Bazan, orginally of Peru, pray during a serice at St. Paul Catherdal in Oakland on Sunday, Nov. 24, 2013. This was a special service conducted by Pittsburgh Bishop David Zubik regarding immigration reform.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Bishop David Zubik leads prayers at St. Paul Cathedral in Oakland on Sunday, Nov. 24, 2013, during a special service regarding immigration reform.
Bishop David Zubik, the diocese and its Catholic Charities filed a federal lawsuit asking U.S. District Judge Arthur Schwab to immediately block the government from enforcing the federal health care mandate, which goes into effect on Jan. 1. Schwab said on Thursday, Oct. 24, 2013 that he hopes to rule by December.

Accompanied by parishioners praying the rosary in both English and Spanish, the head of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh led a prayer for comprehensive immigration changes on Sunday afternoon in St. Paul Cathedral in Oakland.

“Tonight we are joining with many other parishes around the country to pray for our legislators, that they might effect a fair and just immigration reform,” Bishop David Zubik said. “We are part of a country that is what it is because of immigrants, and we hope for the wisdom of legislators, that they notice this and pave the way for many others.”

About 100 parishioners attended, and many kept up when the Our Fathers and Hail Marys switched from English to Spanish.

“It’s a matter of making sure our policies are fair to everyone, not punitive,” Zubik said after the evening prayer and benediction, noting that his grandparents were immigrants. “We need to give the immigrants of our century the same latitude that we gave the immigrants of the last century.”

The Senate passed a comprehensive immigration bill this year, but the House has not signaled any willingness to take it up in what remains of the year.

The Obama administration has focused on making smaller changes to immigration rules, such as a program allowing young illegals a reprieve from deportation under certain conditions, or another change that would “parole in place” illegal immigrant spouses, children and parents of U.S. service members, reservists and veterans.

Pope Francis has called for a World Day of Migrants and Refugees on Jan. 14.

Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington, questioned why the Catholic Church would lobby for immigration changes as a black-and-white moral issue, similar to its stance on abortion or euthanasia. Immigration policy, he said, was far more like tax policy in its areas of gray.

“I try to avoid cynicism and the idea that the church is trying to lobby for more warm bodies in the pews, but it’s hard not to,” Krikorian said. “I’m not saying that there’s no moral component to immigration, but the way the church is weighing into this is trying to make it a black-and-white issue.”

Zubik’s prayer service did not include many specifics of what the church was praying for. The United States Conference of Bishops’ platform for immigration change includes:

• “Earned legalization” for immigrants who can pass a background check and pay a fine.

• A legal path for immigrants to cross borders for work.

• More measures to keep immigrant families together.

• Elimination of some of the penalties in the 1996 Illegal Immigrant Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act.

• Measures allowing enforcement to focus on illegal immigrants who pose risks to public safety, rather than families seeking work.

• Ways to address the root causes in immigrants’ countries of origin that lead them to risk crossing into the United States illegally.

Matthew Santoni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5625 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.