Archive

ShareThis Page
Clairton man gets 1 year, 1 day in prison in cocaine conspiracy case | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Clairton man gets 1 year, 1 day in prison in cocaine conspiracy case

Tribune-Review
| Monday, September 10, 2018 10:12 p.m
217908webcourts10

A Clairton man has been sentenced to a year and one day in prison for his role in a far-reaching narcotics ring, federal prosecutors said Monday.

Jojuan Bray, 21, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute narcotics, admitting to purchasing and selling about 230 grams of cocaine in the Clairton area between March and June of last year, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said.

Bray’s sentencing of a year in prison followed by three years of supervised release marked the ninth person to be sentenced of 21 defendants who were charged in the broader conspiracy investigation , Brady said.

In his guilty plea, Bray admitting to buying cocaine from his codefendant, Skyler Carter.

In June, Carter pleaded guilty to distributing fentanyl resulting in an overdose death.

Carter has acknowledged in court that he was responsible for the distribution of at least 160 grams of fentanyl, 280 grams of cocaine base and 3.5 kilograms of cocaine. Carter faces 20 years to life in prison and a fine of up to $1 million.

His sentencing was scheduled for early October.

U.S. District Judge Arthur J. Schwab imposed the one-year prison sentence on Bray.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Carolyn J. Bloch is prosecuted the case with help from the FBI, the Allegheny County Sheriff’s office and Allegheny County and Pittsburgh police.

The investigation was funded by the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force, which provides money for federal and state agencies to work together on cases involving major drug trafficking and criminal enterprises.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, nlindstrom@tribweb.com or via Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.