ShareThis Page
Clean air activists get hour-plus meeting with Allegheny County executive |

Clean air activists get hour-plus meeting with Allegheny County executive

Theresa Clift
| Friday, August 3, 2018 5:06 p.m
Protesters gather in the Allegheny County Courthouse courtyard to voice concerns about air quality on Aug. 3, 2018.

Five environmental activists went to Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald’s office Friday to deliver petitions about air quality concerns and ended up in a more than hour-long private meeting with Fitzgerald and three other county officials.

Members of the local chapter of PennEnvironment asked county officials not to use Clean Air Fund money for office renovations, to hire more air quality staff for the health department and made other requests during the meeting, said Ashleigh Deemer, PennEnvironment’s Western Pennsylvania director.

A reporter was not allowed in the meeting.

The group has gathered more than 2,000 signatures from Allegheny County residents asking for the same requests, Deemer said.

When the activists went to deliver the first 1,000 petitions last month, officers from the Allegheny County Sheriff’s Office did not allow the group of nine people to enter Fitzgerald’s office. County Spokeswoman Amie Downs said it was a miscommunication and went to retrieve the petitions from the courtyard and gave them to Fitzgerald.

Fitzgerald on Friday turned down the group’s request for a town hall-style event where members of the public could voice air quality concerns, Deemer said. Board of Health meetings are open to the public and public comments are accepted, but comments on non-agenda items are saved for the end of the meetings, which often last more than three hours and occur just past noon on weekdays.

“We have a lot of people in the county who have their perspective and just want to be heard. We as organizations can’t speak for all of them and petition signatures don’t tell the whole story,” Deemer said.

Downs said the county executive instead asked the group for solutions, proposals or actions that could have an impact on air quality. Deemer told the officials in the meeting they had several and would provide those to Fitzgerald, Downs said.

County officials in the meeting Friday stood by their decision to use $10 million from the Clean Air Fund and Title V Fund to renovate offices for health department’s air quality staff, Deemer said. Philadelphia-based Clean Air Council and Edgewood-based Group Against Smog And Pollution sued the county over that issue in June.

“We want the Clean Air funds to be used for actually cleaning the air,” said Matt Mehalik, director of the Hill District-based Breathe Project.

The activists praised the county officials for fining US Steel $1 million for pollution at Clairton Coke Works — a fine the company is appealing — and asked the county to fight back. Deemer said county officials told the group they are trying.

“They said they’re not messing around with consent decrees anymore. We appreciate that because we think Clairton Coke Works is one of the largest sources of pollution in the county,” Deemer said.

Mehalik agreed.

“We want to stand behind the health department’s enforcement action on US Steel’s Clairton Coke Works,” Mehalik said. “We want to ensure that the health department follows through on its enforcement action … that’s a $1 million fine and requirements for them to either fix two of their worst performing coke batteries or shut them down.”

Downs said: “We were glad to hear that Ashleigh and the other representatives/canvassers are supportive of the actions that the health department is taking and that the items outlined in their petition – crackdown on polluters, revision of existing permits, and increasing consequences for violating the law – were either already being done or were underway.”

Fitzgerald and county officials have met with the environmental groups several times before Friday, and another meeting is scheduled for later this month, Downs said.

Read more local news happening in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Theresa at 412-380-5669, or via Twitter @tclift.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Theresa at 412-380-5669, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.