ShareThis Page
Climbers step up in One Oxford Centre to benefit American Lung Association |

Climbers step up in One Oxford Centre to benefit American Lung Association

| Sunday, March 16, 2014 9:00 p.m

If all goes well, Shaney Enck will scale 897 steps in just less than nine minutes.

Enck, 12, of Saxonburg will lead her team but probably won’t be the first to the top.

“We had one guy last year who made it up in five minutes,” said Maggie Fromm, 24, of the North Shore. “And the first responders in full gear will be right behind him.”

More than 470 people have registered for the eighth annual “Fight for Air” Climb at One Oxford Centre on Saturday.

Runners dash up the Downtown skyscraper to benefit the American Lung Association. As of Friday, the campaign collected about 40 percent of its $150,000 fundraising goal through a combination of individual, team and corporate sponsors.

Fromm, a first-time runner and development manager at the association, encouraged climbers of all abilities to participate. Awards will be given.

Dianne McMaster, 50, of North Huntingdon said she climbed all 45 floors in 18 minutes last year. She didn’t practice, so this year she and 19 others started meeting on weekends to climb the University of Pittsburgh’s Cathedral of Learning.

Enck set the pace for Team Zada for the past three years.

“She has so much energy,” said her mother and association committee member, Stacey Enck, 44. “We lost my dad, her Zada, to lung cancer four years ago. He probably contracted it from smoking, even though he quit 15 years before the diagnosis.”

With his death, the Encks dedicated themselves to educating others.

“Even if you quit, there’s no guarantee you dodge that bullet,” Stacey Enck said.

The association holds the event annually to spread awareness about local air quality. Last year was the first time all eight air-quality monitoring sites in Allegheny County met Environmental Protection Agency standards for fine particulate pollution, county officials said Friday.

Seven sites — Avalon, Clairton, North Braddock, Harrison, Lawrenceville, North Park and Fayette — met standards before. Last year was the first year the monitoring site in Liberty met federal standards, according to the county.

Health Director Karen Hacker said in a statement the milestone marks a “huge leap forward” in the county’s efforts to improve air quality. Fine particle pollution, derived from coal-fired power plants, auto emissions and coke works, have long plagued the Mon Valley.

The Pittsburgh region was one of two places outside California to rank among the 25 most polluted in the association’s “State of the Air 2013” report.

In the report, Allegheny County trimmed its average of unhealthy air days to 20.7 from 26.3 in the year prior, but still earned an overall “F” grade. The association’s methodology considers only the worst daily readings from federal monitors, particularly those of Liberty, a borough about 16 miles southeast of Downtown that is downwind of U.S. Steel Corp.’s Clairton Coke Works, the nation’s largest coke plant.

Megan Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach her at 412-388-5815.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.