ShareThis Page
CMU student who sold Android-infecting software sentenced to 3 years probation |

CMU student who sold Android-infecting software sentenced to 3 years probation

The Associated Press
| Monday, February 6, 2017 8:42 a.m
James Knox | Trib Total Media
Morgan Culbertson — accompanied by his father, Robert F. Culbertson III — makes his way into the Federal Courthouse, Downtown, on Tuesday, Aug. 25, 2015, to plead guilty for his alleged involvement in the Darkode investigation.

A Carnegie Mellon University student on Monday was sentenced to three years probation, with 300 hours of community service and computer monitoring, for developing and selling malicious software that allowed others to remotely control Google Android smartphones.

Morgan Culbertson, 22, of Churchill pleaded guilty in August 2015 to conspiracy for his role in the malware distribution, which enabled those who bought the software to use the phones’ cameras to spy on their owners.

U.S. District Judge Arthur J. Schwab imposed the sentence, according to acting U.S. Attorney Soo C. Song.

Culbertson is one of 12 people living in the United States who were charged in the takedown of the Darkode cybercriminal marketplace in July.

Starting in 2013, Culbertson conspired to design and sell Dendroid on an online criminal marketplace known as Darkode, Assistant U.S. Attorney James Kitchen said.

The malware could hide itself within a legitimate Android app without affecting the app’s functioning. Culbertson designed the malware to avoid detection by anti-virus scanners and Google Play Store’s security features, Kitchen said.

Consequently, victims would download the app and Dendroid would then infect their phone, allowing the purchaser of the malware to steal files, take pictures, intercept text messages and record phone conversations, Kitchen said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.