ShareThis Page
Consumer advocacy group singles out dangerous toys |

Consumer advocacy group singles out dangerous toys

The Associated Press
| Tuesday, November 20, 2018 4:36 p.m

Parents, beware of slime.

The U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund, a national consumer advocacy, released its annual “Trouble in Toyland” report on Tuesday warning that a number of toys – including the popular product slime – can be harmful to children, but at least two manufacturers disputed the findings.

Michael Samuelson, campaign associate with PIRG’s Pennsylvania chapter, was joined by Pittsburgh City Councilwoman Erika Strassburger and Allegheny County Controller Chelsa Wagner in announcing the report’s findings in a council conference room.

Samuelson said slime contained “dangerous levels” of the chemical boron which can cause nausea, vomiting and long term reproductive health issues – if eaten.

“In recent years slime has become an increasingly popular toy,” he said. “Unfortunately our testing has found that several popular slimes, including the brands we have here, contain dangerously high levels and toxic levels of borax, which is a form of boron, and up to 15 times the limit that the European Union has determined is safe for use.”

The United States has no set limit for boron in products. Samuelson said the European Union has a limit of 300 parts per million and that PIRG is calling for warning labels on slime packaging and an investigation to determine if the United States should set limits.

PIRG said it tested six varieties of slime that contained dangerous levels of boron including, “Kangaroos Original Super Cool Slime,” which had concentrations as high as 4,700 parts per million.

The Tribune-Review reached out to all six companies, but only Kangaroo Manufacturing based in Tempe, Ariz., could be reached for comment.

“Kangaroo Manufacturing is stating that all of our products are tested and meet U.S. standards,” a spokeswoman said.

Samuelson said PIRG has privacy concerns about so-called “smart toys” that use the internet and phone applications to interact with children – including California-based Wonder Workshop’s Dashboard robot.

“Unfortunately, many of these toys collect data on children and share consumer information that can potentially violate a child’s privacy,” he said. “Last year the FBI issued a stark warning that these features put the privacy and safety of children at risk due to the large amount of personal information that may be unwittingly exposed.”

Wonder Workshop CEO Vikas Gupta told CNN that information about Dash categorically false.

“That is absolutely incorrect,” Gupta told CNN. “We don’t collect any personal identifiable information from children, and we do not share any information from the apps or the software or robots to any third-party ever. None of that happens.”

PIRG also singled out toys as choking hazards – particularly balloons – and those that it said could damage hearing by making excessive noise.

Strassburger, who is an expecting mother, and Wagner who has several young children, thanked Samuelson and PIRG for the information.

“In March, I’m going to be expecting my first child,” Strassburger said. “The last thing I want to be thinking about as a new parent is whether there are toxic chemicals in my child’s toy or whether a new gift that someone has given me has some hidden unknown choking hazard. Parents shouldn’t have to be detectives when it comes to keeping their children safe from their toys.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, or via Twitter @bobbauder.

Michael Samuelson, a campaign associate with the Public Interest Research Group’s Pennsylvania chapter, displays slime, a children’s toy that PIRG says contains harmful amounts of the chemical boron.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.