ShareThis Page
DA: Elizabeth Borough police’s use of force ‘not inappropriate’ |

DA: Elizabeth Borough police’s use of force ‘not inappropriate’

| Thursday, January 5, 2017 4:18 p.m
An incident between Elizabeth Borough police Officer Garrett Kimmell and drug suspect Joshua Brooks is captured on police department video.

An Elizabeth Borough police officer did not use excessive force when he fought with and used a Taser on a drug suspect in his custody, the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office said Thursday.

The April 17, 2015, incident involving Officer Garrett Kimmell and the suspect, Joshua Brooks, was captured on police department video, which was released Wednesday as part of a federal lawsuit against Kimmell and the borough. A second officer, Dan Verno, also is named in the lawsuit for failing to intervene.

“In September 2016, our office reviewed the videotape concerning the arrest of Joshua Brooks and, after consulting with a use of force expert, determined that the actions of the arresting officer were not inappropriate given the circumstances,” Mike Manko, a spokesman for District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr., said in a prepared statement.

After the altercation, officers filed 29 charges, including aggravated assault of a police officer, resisting arrest, obstructing administration of law and simple assault, among others, along with drug-related offenses.

Brooks, 21, of East Pittsburgh spent two months in jail with a $50,000 bond, said his defense attorney, Lena Bryan-Henderson.

All of the charges except drug possession were dismissed before a Dec. 13 trial in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. Brooks pleaded guilty to the possession charge, which involved heroin, and was sentenced to six months’ probation.

“Our office also determined in preparation for trial, which took place last month, that we could not sustain our burden of proof on the charges of assault that had been filed against Brooks, in part because the arresting officer did not sustain any serious bodily injury,” Manko said. “For that reason, all charges other than the drug possession charge were withdrawn.”

She said the district attorney’s office had a copy of the videotape “from the beginning.”

“I wish that the DA’s office would have looked at this case earlier and said, ‘We should withdraw the charges against this young man,’” Bryan-Henderson said. “I am thankful that they finally did do that. It would have been helpful had they done it earlier.”

Manko declined to comment further.

On Wednesday, Pittsburgh attorney Todd Hollis filed a federal civil rights lawsuit on behalf of Brooks against Kimmell, Verno and the borough. Hollis said he waited to release the video until Brooks’ criminal matter was resolved.

Elizabeth Police Chief Timothy Butler declined comment Thursday. He referred the matter to borough Solicitor Krisha A. DiMascio, who did not return phone calls.

The initial incident began after Kimmell arrested Brooks on suspicion of heroin possession. Kimmell confronted Brooks, whose leg was shackled to a bench, at the police station. A surveillance video, which has no audio, captured the nearly three-minute scuffle.

Hollis wrote in his lawsuit that Kimmell “delivered multiple blows to Brooks, using his forearms, elbows and knees.”

The video shows Brooks fighting back. Hollis contended Brooks “lifted Kimmell and held him backward against the wall in an effort to restrain him and stop (Kimmell’s) use of unnecessary force.”

During the video, a second officer enters the room and pulls Brooks off Kimmell.

“Kimmell then drew his Taser and Tasered Brooks,” Hollis wrote in the lawsuit.

The lawsuit alleges Brooks, who had one arm in a cast, stood up from the bench once while in police custody and refused to sit down, which precipitated the fight.

“When Brooks declined to sit back down, Kimmell began to come toward Brooks,” Hollis wrote in the lawsuit. “In the police report prepared by Kimmell, he justifies choking Brooks to get him to sit back down and to remove Brooks’ hand from Kimmell’s Taser.”

The video, Hollis said, shows that Brooks never reached for Kimmell’s Taser.

Bryan-Henderson said her client was choking and responded in an attempt to save his life.

“It’s obvious on tape that my client was attacked,” she said, “and he did not fight back until there was nothing else for him to do.”

Ben Schmitt is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7991 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.