Date set for special state House election to replace Marc Gergely |

Date set for special state House election to replace Marc Gergely

Cindy Shegan Keeley | Tribune-Review
State Rep. Marc Gergely
Former Rep. Marc Gergely of White Oak

A special election will be held Jan. 23 to fill the vacancy created by former state Rep. Marc Gergely’s resignation, House Speaker Mike Turzai said Thursday.

Gergely, a Democrat from White Oak, pleaded guilty in August to two misdemeanor charges related to his role in an illegal gambling machine ring. He resigned Nov. 6 and is awaiting sentencing.

Republicans and Democrats will each select a nominee to place on the special election ballot, Turzai said.

Gergely was first elected to the 35th legislative district seat in 2002. He won re-election by about 42 percentage points in 2014, a year after his name was linked to the gambling ring; and by about 25 points last November, eight months after he was charged for his role in it.

A state grand jury presentment said Gergely used his position and influence to try to calm jittery business owners who were leery about putting gambling machines owned by Ronald “Porky” Melocchi in their businesses. Melocchi’s gambling ring was worth more than $1 million when authorities raided it in 2013. He was sentenced last year to 10 years of probation.

The 35th legislative district includes McKeesport, Munhall, White Oak, Clairton, Duquesne, Versailles, Whitaker, Lincoln, South Versailles and part of West Mifflin.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5676, [email protected] or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.