Deadline remains for Penn Hills families to move out of condemned apartments |

Deadline remains for Penn Hills families to move out of condemned apartments

Penn Hills officials, while sympathetic, said they could not extend a 5-day time limit to residents who were ordered to move out of their apartments last week.

“We’re compassionate to the crisis that’s happening there but our ordinance is set up because of health and safety … it’s unsafe for occupancy,” said Scott Andrejchak, Penn Hills manager. “It’s an unfortunate situation – that we didn’t create.”

The municipality’s code enforcement office posted a notice at the apartment complex on Wednesday that condemned the property and ordered all the 25 families to move out by Sept. 20.

“Due to lack of water, electricity, sanitary systems and a fire alarm system it has been deemed that the property has unsafe equipment and is unsafe for human occupancy,” the note said. “If property is not secured or all occupants have not vacated by Sept. 20, 2018 the municipality will remove all occupants and secure property.”

Andrejchak identified the owner of Val Mar Gardens as Prasad Margabandhu.

“(He) has some history with the code office,” Andrejchak said. “This hasn’t happened in a vacuum and it is not a first go around.”

A call to the Penn Hills code enforcement office went unanswered.

Margabandhu could not be reached for comment. When a Tribune-Review reporter called his number, a man who called himself Shane answered the phone and declined to answer questions.

A company called PA Real Estate Development Inc. bought the complex in January, according to Allegheny County real estate records. That company was created in 2013 and has a Mount Washington address, according to state records.

Margabandhu faced legal issues July 2017 for neglected code violations in buildings located in Arlington Heights and Swissvale, according to a report by Trib’s news partner, WPXI.

A group of about 10 residents marched to the Wilkinsburg-Penn Joint Water Authority on Monday to raise awareness about the issue and demanded the water company to turn on the service.

At one point, the group entered the water authority’s lobby with water buckets, signs and American flags, chanting: “What do we want?” “Water.” “When do we need it?” “Now.”

Nick Bianchi, the water authority’s executive director, asked the group to continue the protest outside and invited a few members of the group to talk behind closed doors. He did not allow media to attend.

Bianchi said the meeting was productive.

“We did meet with the tenants, we’ve agreed that if the tenants can produce an injunction to turn the water back on, then we’ll turn the water back on immediately,” said Bianchi. He said the water authority’s solicitor will meet with the residents’ attorney.

Val Mar resident Andre Mogley said the residents’ attorney is Eileen Yacknin, of Neighborhood Legal Services Association. When reached on the phone, Yacknin declined to talk about the case.

“It’s very stressful not knowing where I’m going to go,” said Andrea Skiles, a former Section 8 resident at Val Mar Gardens. She said she moved out of her place there over the weekend to another apartment complex in Wilkinsburg.

Skiles, 40, moved herself, her daughter and a service dog. She said the building’s electricity was turned off on Labor Day, then the water was turned off on Sept. 10.

“On the 11 th , they turned off the (natural) gas and on the 12 th (the building) was condemned and we got until the 20 th to move out. No warning … it’s just wrong,” Skiles said.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.