Empty gas tank foils would-be robber in Pittsburgh |

Empty gas tank foils would-be robber in Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh police Officer Clarence Ford

The devil was in the details for a wannabe “armed” robber who tried to strike a pharmacy Wednesday morning in Pittsburgh – that detail being the all-important “fill the gas tank of the getaway car.”

Police responded Wednesday morning to a Rite Aid in the city’s Morningside neighborhood for a report of white man in his 30s who showed a pistol and demanded money from the cashier, according to a Facebook post from Zone 5 police.

“The robber, later identified as Anthony Scolieri, 39, fled the store with a small amount of cash and jumped into his red Ford Mustang – which had NO gas in the tank,” police wrote in the post.

With no getaway car, Scolieri ran to an alleyway where he encountered Officer Clarence Ford, police said. Ford, who’d received a description of the robbery suspect, immediately recognized Scolieri as the suspect.

Ford and other officers took Scolieri into custody — “quickly and without anyone getting hurt,” police said.

The pistol was fake. Officers were able to recover the stolen cash.

Court records show Scolieri is charged with three counts of robbery and one count of possession of an instrument of crime.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.