ShareThis Page
Federal grant to ‘connect’ Hill District, Downtown falls short of hopes |

Federal grant to ‘connect’ Hill District, Downtown falls short of hopes

| Wednesday, September 10, 2014 3:36 p.m
A proposed 'cap' linking the Lower Hill District and downtown Pittsburgh would include a city park and pedestrian bridge over Interstate 579 with trees and sidewalks.

Development of the former Civic Arena site would provide job and business opportunities to residents, offer subsidies to homeowners and include aspects of the neighborhood’s history in new construction, according to an agreement between the Penguins and Hill District representatives.

Fresh details of the deal emerged on Wednesday, a day after Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto and other public officials announced it with plans for revitalizing the Hill and neighboring Uptown through a tax-increment financing package.

The agreement permits the Penguins, which hold development rights to the arena site, to begin construction in nine to 12 months. It also paves the way for implementation of the TIF, which commits more than $400 million generated over 20 years in new taxes for such things as infrastructure, improvements to existing homes and storefronts, mortgage subsidies and cut-rate housing in the Hill and Uptown.

City Councilman R. Daniel Lavelle, who represents the Hill, said the plans would reinvigorate one of Pittsburgh’s most economically depressed neighborhoods.

“My biggest concerns were always the job and the business opportunities on (the arena) site being afforded to the Hill District because that is what’s going to lift this community out of poverty,” said Lavelle, who lives in the Upper Hill.

It also benefits the Penguins. The hockey franchise won development rights to a 28-acre site under a 2007 agreement brokered by former Gov. Ed Rendell to build the Consol Energy Center to replace the Civic Arena and prevent the Pens from leaving Pittsburgh.

The state kicked in at least $47.6 million to build the hockey arena and is subsidizing construction on the Civic Arena site. It gave the Penguins a $15 million line of credit that can be used to purchase parcels on former Civic Arena property from the Sports & Exhibition Authority and Urban Redevelopment Authority.

“You divide that entire 28 acres up into individual plots, and they can lease it or sell it or do whatever they want with it,” said Sala Udin, a former city councilman and member of the Lower Hill Working Group, which negotiated the agreement with the Penguins. “In addition to all that, they got a brand new arena. That, I would say, is a very generous deal.”

Travis Williams, Penguins chief operating officer, said the development benefits the region.

“By really taking this 28 acres and improving it and creating jobs and tax revenue and improving the livelihoods of people down there around the Consol Energy Center we think benefits everybody, including us,” he said.

The SEA, which owns the property along with the URA, will tap state grant money that’s been awarded to begin the work in the fall, SEA Executive Director Mary Conturo said. She said the SEA would reapply for federal grants.

“We always expected to be doing this over (multiple) years,” she said.

The SEA won a $1.55 million grant to design a proposed “cap” over Crosstown Boulevard that would feature a park and improve the connection between Downtown and the Hill District for pedestrians, officials said.

The U.S. Department of Transportation this week did not award $19.9 million in funding the city sought to rebuild streets, utilities and other infrastructure on the site.

“We didn’t get all the money we asked for, but this was a very positive signal,” said U.S. Rep. Mike Doyle, D-Forest Hills. “It would make no sense for (the Department of Transportation) to put money into this project if they didn’t want to partner in the rest of it.”

Bob Bauder and Tom Fontaine are staff writers for Trib Total Media. Bauder can be reached at 412-765-2312 or Fontaine can be reached at 412-320-7847 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.