ShareThis Page
Flooded Allegheny County businesses may get some federal help |

Flooded Allegheny County businesses may get some federal help

Timothy Puko
| Saturday, July 13, 2013 9:31 p.m

Allegheny County is hoping to get federal aid for some businesses hit by floods this past week.

County workers visited Scott and Findlay Friday and Saturday to do damage assessments, said Steve Wilharm, the county’s emergency manager. The county is also assessing Oakdale, Bridgeville, Elizabeth Township and Elizabeth Borough, Lincoln, South Park, Upper St. Clair and West Elizabeth before state and federal emergency officials visit the region this week, county officials said.

Local municipalities are limited in what they can seek because so few homes — probably less than 30 ­— had flooding on the first floor, which is what’s required for emergency grants, Wilharm said.

The county may be able to show that more than 25 businesses had major uninsured losses, which would qualify them for low-interest disaster loans from the Small Business Administration, he added.

Torrential rain arrived in two waves Wednesday, hitting some areas with as much 3 inches in 3 hours while ground was already saturated from other recent storms. It flooded roads and basements, and toppled trees, leaving more than 10,000 people without power into Thursday.

Duquesne Light restored power Friday night to the final 116 customers in Mt. Lebanon, Shaler, Duquesne and Hopewell.

The American Red Cross gave out more than 200 clean-up kits, mostly to Mon Valley communities, on Thursday and Friday, spokeswoman Lauren C. Ashley said.

Timothy Puko is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7991 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.