Archive

ShareThis Page
Glassport man faces charges for shooting dogs | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Glassport man faces charges for shooting dogs

Tawnya Panizzi
| Monday, December 31, 2018 7:15 a.m
590609ptrdogsshot010119
WPXI
Charges are pending against a Glassport man who reportedly shot two of his dogs on Dec. 28, 2018.

Charges are pending against a Glassport man who is accused of shooting two of his dogs on Dec. 28.

Police have not released the man’s name, but said he confessed to shooting and dumping the dogs after they got into a fight, WPXI reported.

Sable Kennel in McKeesport posted on Facebook that one of the dogs, a pit bull mix named Sampson, is recovering after being shot multiple times. The second dog did not survive.

The owner is accused of shooting both dogs after driving them to the Glassport dump along Virginia Avenue. The deceased dog was found buried under a pile of rocks.

Animal control officers were originally called Dec. 28 to corral Sampson, who was spotted running loose. They believed at first that he was hit by a car but discovered he was shot and possibly stabbed, their post said. Sable Kennel posted that Sampson’s medical bills topped $580 but he was treated and is being fostered.

Donations can be made to pghpetdetective.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, tpanizzi@tribweb.com or via Twitter @tawnyatrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.