Goldfish prank backfires at FirstEnergy nuclear power plant |

Goldfish prank backfires at FirstEnergy nuclear power plant

Six contractors were apparently responsible for a fishy situation at one of FirstEnergy Corp.’s nuclear power plants.

FirstEnergy spent a month investigating how a pitcher holding two goldfish got left in a secure area of its Perry Nuclear Power Plant outside Cleveland. Even federal regulators got involved.

The company on Thursday said that the contractors, who were hired to remove and replace insulation on pipes for inspections, confessed to smuggling five goldfish into the plant in their lunch boxes as a prank.

They avoided security measures designed to look for explosives, guns and other contraband that could actually damage the plant, said Jennifer Young, a spokeswoman for Akron-based FirstEnergy.

“There was no malicious intent that we are aware of,” Young said. “It definitely doesn’t meet the professionalism we expect from our contractors and our employees.”

Because bringing in fish is not actually a security breach, no laws were broken and no criminal charges can be filed, Young said. The workers, however, will not be allowed on FirstEnergy projects any longer, Young said.

She referred questions about the workers and possible discipline to their union, the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied Workers. James A. Grogan, president of the union, did not return a telephone call or respond to an email for comment.

Plant workers never found three of the five goldfish, and believe they were gathered and thrown away during a cleanup at the plant, Young said.

Timothy Puko is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7991 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.