Archive

ShareThis Page
Gov. Wolf: Jerk and jagoff have same meaning; neither word is profane | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Gov. Wolf: Jerk and jagoff have same meaning; neither word is profane

Megan Guza
| Thursday, May 24, 2018 5:00 p.m
PTRLIVYINZ01010514
Keith Hodan | Tribune-Review
Marcia Feinberg models a few of the 'Pittsburghese' items, including the jag-off glasses and a puzzle featuring well-known 'Yinzer' words and phrases, Friday, December 20, 2013. Marcia is the president of the Mike Feinberg Company store in the Strip District.
ptrwolf052518
Bob Bauder | Tribune-Review
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf discusses nurse staffing levels with registered nurses from the region on Thursday, May 24, 2018, at the Community College of Allegheny County.

Gov. Tom Wolf said state Republicans “should spend more time in Western Pennsylvania” if they think Braddock Mayor John Fetterman’s use of the word jagoff is profane.

Wolf, who appeared at the Community College of Allegheny County on Thursday to talk with nurses about safe nurse staffing levels, said jagoff is not a profanity.

“Someone wrote if somebody butts in line at Hershey Park, that person’s a jerk. If someone butts in line at Kennywood Park, that’s a jagoff,” Wolf said while talking to reporters after his discussion with nurses. “Neither one of those are swear words, I think.”

The Pennsylvania Republican Party last week criticized Fetterman, a Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor, for what they described as “profanity laced attacks on President Trump.” Fetterman during his primary campaign sold T-shirts that said “Trump is a jagoff.”

The GOP tweeted a picture of Fetterman holding one of the shirts.

Republicans later said they stand by their opinion of the word.

Wolf described Fetterman as a “fine person” and said he and the mayor had lunch after the election. They talked about Fetterman’s desire to expand the role of lieutenant governor.

Fetterman has said he would use the position to champion progressive causes including legalizing marijuana, addressing the opioid problem and expanding health care.

“The constitution is fairly silent on the role of a lieutenant governor and in fact what happens is the role of lieutenant governor is whatever the governor and lieutenant governor make it,” Wolf said. “I think John’s a fine person … and I look forward to working with him.”

He said he and Fetterman share the same policy preferences.

In other matters, Wolf said he was surprised Commonwealth Court issued an injunction Monday putting a halt to the licensing of medical marijuana research facilities. He said he plans to figure out how to work around the injunction.

He also promised to pump $130 million into pothole repairs and work to increase nurse staffing levels. Nurses from the region who met with Wolf described how one nurse could be in charge of as many as 50 patients at a time in an extended care facility.

“This has been a tough winter throughout Pennsylvania and road surfaces are as bad as I’ve ever seen them,” the governor said. I want to accelerate this and I think we’re focused on getting everything done by September.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312, bbauder@tribweb.com or on Twitter @bobbauder.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, mguza@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.