Hermitage woman charged in 2013 slaying |

Hermitage woman charged in 2013 slaying

Tracy Linn Hassel, charged with slaying of Mercer County businessman

A bloody, broken cigarette was one of many key pieces of evidence that gave authorities in Mercer County the proof they say they needed to charge a woman with the slaying of a Greenville businessman.

Tracy Linn Hassel, 31, of Hermitage, who is incarcerated in the State Correctional Facility for Women in Muncy for an unrelated burglary conviction, is charged with second-degree murder, third-degree murder, robbery and burglary for the stabbing death of Frank R. Crash, 76, inside his home in Hempfield, near Greenville, District Attorney Robert Kochems said during a news conference Thursday.

According to the criminal complaint:

The body of Crash, who had been stabbed more than 70 times, was found by family members on the morning of July 25, 2013, when he didn’t arrive for work at Frank Crash Auto Wrecking. A diamond ring and money he was always known to carry around in one of his front pockets were missing.

The cigarette, which showed DNA evidence of Hassel and Crash, was found near a back door that had been pried open. Hassel’s DNA also was found on the door.

Her boyfriend told detectives that Hassel — who acknowledged having an intimate relationship with Crash — told him she stabbed the businessman.

Investigators are trying to determine whether a second “person of interest” was involved in the slaying, Kochems said.

Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.