Hill District residents want neighborhood’s interests protected |

Hill District residents want neighborhood’s interests protected

About a dozen Hill District residents on Tuesday asked the Pittsburgh Planning Commission to help protect the neighborhood’s interests as the former Civic Arena site is developed.

“I would consider this an assurance that we don’t repeat history,” said Marimba Milliones, president and CEO of the Hill Community Development Corp.

Much of the Hill District was demolished in the 1950s for the Civic Arena, displacing thousands of residents and hundreds of businesses. At a three-hour public hearing Tuesday that drew more than 80 people, some said they worried the new development — still subject to approval by the commission and City Council — would price residents out of the Hill.

An agreement reached in Septemberby city, neighborhood and Pittsburgh Penguins leaders — known as the Community Collaboration and Implementation Plan, or CCIP — lays out conditions for the $440 million development, from the percentage of housing that must be for lower-income residents to participation by minority- and female-owned businesses.

It calls for a committee to oversee the project, including at least three people appointed by city government, three by a Hill District community group and three by the Penguins. The team has an option to buy the Civic Arena site.

“Hopefully we can address any problems that might arise through (the committee), but the committee’s role is to oversee the project,” Milliones said. “We want the planning commission to be a contributing partner in the long-term enforcement of the CCIP.”

Planning Director Ray Gastil said the eight-member commission will discuss the development at its next meeting on Dec. 2.

“We’ll be looking at different ways the (CCIP) can be recognized,” Gastil said. “But I have some concerns about wholly attaching it to the preliminary land development plans … because a number of the tasks, including dispute resolution and developer selection, are just not in the best practices of a planning commission.”

Dusty Kirk, an attorney for the Penguins, agreed that the planning commission would be the “wrong venue” to deal with many development issues outlined in the agreement. She noted that the team signed the agreement and intends to abide by its terms and work collaboratively with city and neighborhood leaders.

Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.