Archive

ShareThis Page
Inmate found dead at Allegheny County Jail ID’d as Tarentum man | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Inmate found dead at Allegheny County Jail ID’d as Tarentum man

Tribune-Review
| Saturday, September 8, 2018 11:18 p.m.
212869webpolicetape1

An Allegheny County Jail inmate was found dead Saturday evening, the warden reported.

An officer making rounds about 4:40 on Pod 8D noticed that a cell window on the pod had been covered, Warden Orlando Harper said.

The officer’s attempts to make contact with the inmate in that were unsuccessful, Harper said, and the officers on duty opened the cell and found the inmate, Dana Abraham, 64, of Tarentum, unresponsive in the cell with bindings around his neck.The bindings were cut and removed from the inmate’s neck, and he was placed on the floor of the cell, Harper said. CPR was administered immediately by responding medical staff, continuing until an EMS arrived. Medics declared the inmate dead at 4:54 p.m.

County police and the medical examiner are investigating.

“As with any incident at the jail, we will conduct a full investigation and review the incident,” Harper added.

Abraham had been in the jail since July 2017 when county police arrested him on attempted homicide and related charges for allegedly trying to shoot his wife and son when they went to a Tarentum neighbor’s home in an attempt to flee from him, according to online court records. He was being held on $25,000 bail awaiting a November nonjury trial, court records show

Tribune-Review staff writer Renatta Signorini contributed.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.