Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority again rejects Pittsburgh mayor’s proposed budget |

Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority again rejects Pittsburgh mayor’s proposed budget

Pittsburgh’s financial overseers accused Mayor Bill Peduto and his staff of being obstructionists, prompting top city administrators to deride a tumultuous public meeting Tuesday as a “kangaroo court.”

Pittsburgh’s relationship with the state-appointed Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority initially turned sour Monday when the board demanded Peduto attend a public meeting at the same time the mayor was delivering a previously scheduled address to City Council.

Tempers boiled over Tuesday when the authority’s board voted to reject Peduto’s $508 million 2015 spending plan for a second time, saying the administration has repeatedly ignored requests seeking financial information.

“At every turn our path has been thwarted by this administration,” said ICA board member Michael I. Danovitz, a Shadyside resident who chairs the Pittsburgh Stadium Authority. “For this reason, I cannot as a board member and as a citizen of the city of Pittsburgh … vote for this budget.”

The motion to reject the budget was approved by 3-1 vote, with Chairman Nick Varischetti, J. Matthew Simon and Danovitz voting in favor. Board Treasurer Ann Dugan dissented and Vice Chairwoman Elise Yanders abstained.

Dugan praised the Peduto administration for “phenomenal” cooperation. “The information is substantially more than we have ever received at any point in time,” she said.

Peduto said his administration has answered every written question from the authority. After the meeting, he characterized the decision to reject the budget as a “hostile action.”

Kevin Acklin, Peduto’s chief of staff, called the authority’s meeting a kangaroo court because its members called for a vote on the budget before allowing administration officials to comment. The authority later permitted the mayor to speak.

“Every question you asked, we provided an answer,” Peduto said, criticizing the authority for having the meeting on Veterans Day, a city holiday. At least 10 members of Peduto’s top staff accompanied him.

The ICA, which has the authority to approve city budgets and ask the state to withhold money to the city, rejected Peduto’s budget proposal Oct. 20. Board members said the administration has failed to supply details about a proposed real estate tax increase, $10 million in payments from the Pittsburgh Parking Authority, new contracts with union employees and about $1.8 million extra in permit fees the mayor has proposed.

The authority gave the city 15 days to provide additional information, after which the authority has 15 days to vote on the budget.

Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.