ShareThis Page
Judge to rule on records violation in East Liberty sisters’ murders |

Judge to rule on records violation in East Liberty sisters’ murders

Jason Cato
| Friday, October 16, 2015 9:40 p.m
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Allen Wade, 43, of East Liberty is escorted in handcuffs from police headquarters on the North Side by Pittsburgh police, on Wednesday, March 5, 2014, after he was charged in the shooting deaths of Susan and Sarah Wolfe who were found dead in their Chislett Street home on February 7.

An Allegheny County judge on Tuesday will hear arguments about whether the man accused of killing two sisters inside their East Liberty home should avoid trial because of allegations that prosecutors improperly obtained his medical records and other background information.

Common Pleas Judge Edward J. Borkowski previously denied requests from the district attorney’s office to gain access to mental health, medical, educational, incarceration, military and other records regarding Allen Wade, 44, who is charged with killing Susan and Sarah Wolfe in February 2014. Wade is charged with homicide, robbery, burglary, theft and other offenses.

The trial is scheduled to begin Nov. 2. If Wade is convicted, prosecutors have said they intend to seek the death penalty.

Wade’s attorneys, however, want the judge to end proceedings on grounds prosecutors violated their client’s constitutional rights by obtaining his records with subpoenas after failing to get court-issued warrants.

“The commonwealth egregiously abused its discretion in issuing these subpoenas,” public defender Lisa Phillips wrote in her motion. “Any information derived from the commonwealth’s gaining improper access to the defendant’s medical and/or mental health records and other records cannot be ‘unlearned’ by the commonwealth and would taint the prosecution of the defendant in this capital case.”

Jason Cato is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7936 or

Jason Cato is a Tribune-Review assistant city editor. You can contact Jason at 412-320-7936, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.