Lieutenant governor’s debate scheduled for Oct. 6 |

Lieutenant governor’s debate scheduled for Oct. 6

Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Democrat lieutenant governor nominee John Fetterman.
Republican lieutenant governor nominee Jeff Bartos

Republican Jeff Bartos and Democrat John Fetterman, Pennsylvania’s nominees for lieutenant governor, will debate one another Oct. 6, Bartos’ campaign announced Friday.

The debate is scheduled to air at 7:30 p.m. on Pittsburgh’s WPXI-TV after it is taped earlier in the afternoon, according to the announcement.

Fetterman, the Braddock mayor, is running with Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf. Bartos, a suburban Philadelphia businessman, is running with Republican gubernatorial nominee and former state Sen. Scott Wagner.

“I look forward to this opportunity to share the Wagner-Bartos vision to lower taxes, grow the economy and improve our education system with the people of Pennsylvania,” Bartos said in the announcement.

Fetterman’s campaign didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Wolf has agreed to one debate with Wagner before the Nov. 6 election. The Oct. 1 debate will be moderated by “Jeopardy!” host Alex Trebek.

When Wolf ran against former Republican Gov. Tom Corbett, the candidates participated in three debates. When a WTAE-TV reporter asked Wolf on Thursday about this year’s lone debate, Wolf cited a “packed” schedule in saying he wouldn’t dedicate time to more debates.

Wagner called Wolf a “gutless coward” in response.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Wes at 412-380-5676, [email protected] or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.