ShareThis Page
McKeesport nursing home lifts some restrictions following Legionella scare |

McKeesport nursing home lifts some restrictions following Legionella scare

| Tuesday, November 22, 2016 5:06 p.m

A McKeesport nursing home has lifted most of its water restrictions following a Legionella bacteria scare, officials said Tuesday.

Kane Regional Center got the all-clear from the Allegheny County Health Department for the water system serving the building’s A side, said Dennis Biondo, Kane’s executive director.

Test results on the other side of the building, known as the B side, are pending, he said. Initial results on that side were low for Legionella.

“But, in the interim, the facility also did a whole house hyper-chlorinating of the water system last week as an additional precaution,” Biondo wrote in an emailed statement. “The expectation is that patients on the B-Side will be returned to normal water use when the next test results come back.”

Legionella bacteria can lead to Legionnaires’ disease, a form of pneumonia that can be fatal to patients with compromised immune systems, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

After an unnamed patient tested positive Oct. 24, administrators ordered residents and staff using the system in question to use bottled water while further testing ensued.

Administrators installed a $30,000 copper-silver ionization disinfection system. Biondo said the cost of the system will come from Kane’s operating budget. Allegheny County runs the Kane centers. Besides McKeesport, Kane has facilities in Ross, Scott and Glen Hazel.

The entire system will be retested next week, Biondo said.

Ben Schmitt is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.