ShareThis Page
Miniature house part of effort to fill Garfield’s 300 vacant lots |

Miniature house part of effort to fill Garfield’s 300 vacant lots

Valley News Dispatch
| Sunday, January 31, 2016 11:00 p.m
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
People leave cityLAB's Tiny House in Garfield on Sunday, Jan. 31, 2016. The house was open to the public from 1 to 4 p.m., with hundreds showing up to get a peek inside the home.
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Susan Ryan, far left, of Highland Park, tours the kitchen of cityLAB's Tiny House in Garfield on Sunday, Jan. 31, 2016. Ryan said she originally heard of the tiny house concept from her sister in California and came to check out the project for herself.

The curious began to trickle in a half-hour before the open house was scheduled to start.

A short while later, a line stretching 15 deep had formed in front of 223 N. Atlantic Ave.

The public got its first peek Sunday inside the tiny house in Garfield, a much-discussed, 350-square-foot dwelling built on a vacant lot.

“It’s a cute little thing,” said Charles Jefferson, a retiree who attended the open house with his wife, Esther. “People with a few kids, it’s not for them. But if I was a single guy, I’d jump on it.”

A small but growing number of Americans are buying or building super-small homes to save money or simplify their lives.

Living with less is the philosophy behind the tiny house movement — the rising popularity of miniature homes, usually less than 500 square feet, some as small as 80 square feet.

It’s small-scale living, and Pittsburgh could see more of it.

The home in Garfield was the brainchild of Eve Picker, founder and CEO of cityLAB, a nonprofit economic development company. She hopes to build more tiny homes to fill some of Garfield’s 300 vacant lots.

“If there’s a market for it, it’ll catch on,” said Jefferson, who lives about a block from the tiny home.

Miniature homes would be better than “empty lots filled with cans and bottles and everything else,” he added.

Less space doesn’t necessarily mean less expensive. Garfield’s tiny home has an asking price of $109,500.

Tom and Doris Schoffstall, who were among the first in line at the open house, thought that was too “costly.”

The couple said they were not willing to trade in their four-bedroom, two-bath home in Lawrenceville for a tiny house.

“We just came out of curiosity, not because we’re interested in buying,” Doris Schoffstall said.

Still, they were impressed with what they saw.

“It’s a lot bigger on the inside than we anticipated,” Tom Schoffstall said. “From the outside, it looks like you’re going to be claustrophobic.”

The home has a kitchen, bathroom and combination bedroom-living space. A basement is accessible through a trap door and ladder.

Troy Salvatore, a 21-year-old civil engineering student at the University of Pittsburgh, attended the open house with several friends who belong to the group Engineers for a Sustainable World.

“From a design perspective, I find it very interesting,” Salvatore said.

He added that the home makes sure no cubic inch goes to waste.

“Because it is so focused on energy efficiency, per square footage it is very expensive,” Salvatore said. “I would worry about the cost in terms of how it fits into this community, but I think this a very good pilot run for what you could do with lots here and around Pittsburgh.”

The Associated Press contributed. Tony Raap is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7827 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.