Archive

ShareThis Page
Missouri woman accused of fatally shooting cousin waives preliminary hearing | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Missouri woman accused of fatally shooting cousin waives preliminary hearing

A Missouri woman waived her right to a preliminary hearing on reduced charges of third-degree murder and involuntary manslaughter in the shooting death of her cousin in Upper St. Clair when she appeared Friday in Pittsburgh Municipal Court.

Allegheny County police initially charged Stephanie Munizza, 28, of Maryland Heights, a St. Louis suburb, with homicide in the death of Joshua Poremski, 27, of Upper St. Clair on Nov. 1. Waiving her right to a hearing means her case will proceed to trial.

“She’s devastated,” defense attorney David J. Shrager said. “I can’t even begin to think the thoughts going through her head or the pain she’s going through. It’s clear to any person who is in her company for more than a few seconds that she’s devastated. I think that’s a pain she’s going to be experiencing for the rest of her life.”

Munizza appeared in court from the Allegheny County Jail. Shrager said she left the jail about 2:30 p.m.

“She’ll be residing with the mother and father of the victim in this case,” Shrager said. “That is love and that is compassion.”

Shrager said Munizza, who was visiting family, talked to Poremski about having a gun for protection while she walked to and from work. Shrager said Munizza never handled a firearm before, but Poremski gave one to her and assured her it was not loaded.

Munizza pointed the gun and fired, hitting Poremski in the head, he said.

The police complaint said Munizza and Poremski were drinking beer and shots of whiskey the night of the incident.

“It’s my position that there was no crime committed,” Shrager said. “This was simply an accident.”

Margaret Harding is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-8519 or [email protected].


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.