ShareThis Page
Moldova man sentenced in federal court in Pittsburgh cyber conspiracy that stole millions |

Moldova man sentenced in federal court in Pittsburgh cyber conspiracy that stole millions

| Thursday, December 6, 2018 8:57 p.m

A Moldova man was sentenced in federal court to time served on his conviction of a conspiracy that stole millions of dollars.

Federal authorities said U.S. District Judge Bissoon imposed the sentence on Andrey Ghinkul, 31, also known as Andrei Ghincul, and “Smilex.”

He was arrested in Cyprus in August 2015 and extradited to the United States in February 2016.

Authorities said the defendant was part of a criminal conspiracy that disseminated the Bugat malware, used malware to steal banking credentials, and then used the stolen credentials to initiate fraudulent electronic funds transfers of millions of dollars from victims’ bank accounts.

Bugat, a multi-function malware package, is also referred to as Cridex and Dridex.

Authorities said it is specifically designed to automate the theft of confidential personal and financial information, such as online banking credentials, from infected computers through the use of keystroke logging and web injects.

The FBI handled the investigation leading to the successful prosecution of Ghinkul. Moldova is an Eastern European country that is former republic of the Soviet Union. Romania is among the countries that it borders.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.