Natural gas industry rains cash for state lawmakers’ campaigns, lobbying efforts |

Natural gas industry rains cash for state lawmakers’ campaigns, lobbying efforts

The natural gas industry spent nearly $50 million on campaign contributions and lobbying in Pennsylvania since 2007, giving it unwarranted influence over lawmakers, according to two advocacy groups that have been criticized for their opposition to gas drilling.

The groups’ report claims the industry contributed $8 million to candidates and spent $41 million on lobbying between 2007 and June of this year.

“Pennsylvania has to get control of political money. It is one of 11 states with no limits on personal campaign contributions. Our goal is to let people know about this,” said Common Cause Pennsylvania Director Barry Kauffman.

Topping the list is Gov. Tom Corbett, whom Common Cause Pennsylvania and Conservation Voters of Pennsylvania identified as getting $2.08 million from 2007 through Oct. 20. Of that, $1.56 million was from industry employees and $526,652 from industry political action committees.

Patrick Henderson, Corbett’s deputy chief of staff, said the two advocacy groups “are fundamentally opposed to gas drilling.”

Common Cause describes itself as a nonpartisan government watchdog group, but its national governing board includes officials from many left-leaning organizations.

With the exception of the 2010 Democratic candidate for governor, Dan Onorato, and outgoing Sen. Tim Solobay, a Washington County Democrat, Republicans got the largest contributions, the report stated.

While not disputing the numbers, Corbett’s office says they are misleading and presented out of context.

“Contributions from this industry were 4 percent of what Gov. Corbett raised in 2010 and less than that this year,” said Henderson. “More than $630 million has been raised (for the state) from impact fees paid by energy companies.”

Gov.-elect Tom Wolf, a Democrat, received $73,000.

“Natural gas is an important part of Pennsylvania’s economy, and Gov.-elect Wolf supports a 5 percent extraction tax,” said spokesman Jeff Sheridan.

Two-thirds of Pennsylvanians favor the extraction tax, said Christopher Borick, professor of political science at Muhlenberg College in Allentown and director of the school’s Institute of Public Opinion.

“But Mike Turzai will have a big say in what happens and whether there is even a vote,” Borick said.

Turzai, R-Bradford Woods, is the new House speaker. He received $272,100 in natural gas industry contributions since 2007 — the fourth-highest amount, according to the study, .

The study sponsors are partisan organizations “and have issues they support. If you increase taxes, you will see the natural gas industry leaving,” said Steve Miskin, an aide to Turzai, who opposes an extraction tax.

Rick Wills is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7944 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.