ShareThis Page
New evidence cited to clear Pitt researcher Ferrante of poisoning wife |

New evidence cited to clear Pitt researcher Ferrante of poisoning wife

Matthew Santoni
| Wednesday, September 9, 2015 10:57 p.m
Robert Ferrante makes his way to the courtroom for his homicide trial Thursday, Oct. 23, 2014, at the Allegheny County Courthouse.

Dr. Robert Ferrante, the University of Pittsburgh researcher convicted of poisoning his wife with cyanide, has asked the co-founder of a Massachusetts biosciences firm to share research that she says could show a harmful byproduct of creatine killed Autumn Marie Klein.

Carol Gebert, business director and co-founder of Worcester, Mass.-based Woodland Biosciences, says the creatine that Klein took in an attempt to increase her fertility can be metabolized and produce a false positive for cyanide poisoning in tests Quest Diagnostics and the Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office used, which helped prosecutors convict Ferrante of murder.

Quest Diagnostics did not respond to a request for comment.

Dr. Cyril Wecht, who testified for the defense during Ferrante’s trial, said it is possible for creatine to produce a false positive for cyanide.

“I don’t know Gebert, her background or her qualifications, but this is something that would have to be checked out,” he said. “Creatine and its metabolites can result in false positives. … There’s a scientific basis for that.”

Gebert said she hopes to join Ferrante’s appeal. But Chris Eyster, Ferrante’s attorney, said he hasn’t committed to including Gebert in the conviction appeal to the Pennsylvania Superior Court.

“I don’t have enough information from her to ascertain whether she’s going to be able to help; my client’s asked her to review the case and see what she can help us with,” Eyster said. “We’re not closing any doors. We’d like to find out what she has to offer.”

He said Gebert’s promise to exonerate his client and her outreach may be “premature.”

Gebert said she was working on a similar case under appeal in Virginia when a fellow volunteer on the appeal mentioned Ferrante’s trial.

“I am the survivor of a creatine-adverse event, years ago,” Gebert said. “I recognized it immediately.”

Gebert has a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from Sydney University and a doctorate from the University of New South Wales, Australia, in bioprocessing, according to the Woodland Biosciences website.

Klein, Gebert contends, died from an adverse reaction to the creatine supplements she was taking at her husband’s urging; the chemicals left over in the body from those supplements then produced a similar test result to cyanide in the lab tests investigators used, she said.

“I just wish I could get his attorney to take me seriously,” Gebert said.

The National Institutes of Health do not indicate whether it is possible to fatally overdose on creatine, only that the substance might be unsafe in high doses, with concern that it could harm the kidneys, liver or heart function. No connection has been proven between high doses of creatine and those effects, nor has it been proven to affect fertility, the NIH says.

Gebert said she has been communicating with Ferrante at the state prison in Camp Hill in Cumberland County and talking to his former research co-authors to back up her research.

Eyster said that by Tuesday, he will file a more detailed statement of the errors several judges made leading up to and during Ferrante’s trial last year as the basis for his appeal.

Gebert said the other case she is working on, an appeal of the 2002 murder conviction of Virginia resident Diane Fleming, involved a lab test that produced a false positive. In that case, it was for methanol in the window cleaner prosecutors said Fleming used to poison her husband. A Virginia appeals court hasn’t ruled on the writ of actual innocence Gebert filed.

In Ferrante’s case, Gebert said she is working on an amicus brief.

Ferrante, 66, is serving a mandatory life sentence without parole for killing his wife, a UPMC neurologist. Prosecutors said Ferrante poisoned Klein with cyanide slipped into her creatine supplements at their home April 17, 2013. She died three days later at UPMC Presbyterian.

His defense attorney at the time, William Difenderfer, had argued that creatine could produce a false positive for cyanide, but jurors chose to believe the lab technicians’ results. Difenderfer could not be reached.

Matthew Santoni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.