Archive

Newsmaker: Dr. Lewis Kuller | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Newsmaker: Dr. Lewis Kuller

ptrpnews112514
Dr. Lewis Kuller, professor emeritus of University of Pittsburgh’s Graduate School of Public Health, received the John Snow Award from the American Public Health Association and the Royal Society for Public Health.

Noteworthy: Kuller received the John Snow Award from the American Public Health Association and the Royal Society for Public Health in England. The award recognizes a scientist for excellence in epidemiologic practice or research.

Age: 80

Residence: Fox Chapel

Family: Wife, Alice, three grown children

Occupation: Professor emeritus, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health

Education: Kuller received his medical degree from George Washington University in 1959. He earned a doctorate in public health from Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health in 1966.

Background: Kuller moved to Pittsburgh in 1972 to be chairman of the Department of Epidemiology at Pitt’s School of Public Health. He held the post for 30 years. As an author of more than 300 scientific articles, mostly in the field of epidemiology, Kuller is recognized as one of the most highly cited researchers in the world.

Quote: “APHA’s recognition of our work in cardiovascular disease prevention, women’s health and, more recently, aging is a testament to the skill and expertise of our team at Pitt Public Health.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.