ShareThis Page
Newsmaker: Jason Lucarelli |

Newsmaker: Jason Lucarelli

Carl Prine
| Saturday, April 9, 2016 9:00 p.m
Jason Lucarelli presented “Why Advocate for LGBTQIA Youth?” at Chatham University.

Noteworthy: On March 29 at Chatham University, Lucarelli gave the keynote address, “Why Advocate for LGBTQIA Youth?” The speech highlighted research Lucarelli has conducted on the population of kids who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, intersex or asexual people.

Age: 33

Residence: Brookline

Family: Daniel Martino, 45, Lucarelli’s longtime partner, died unexpectedly Feb. 17.

Occupation: A full-time graduate student at Chatham, Lucarelli also serves as an Albert Schweitzer Fellow doing volunteer research with the Gay and Lesbian Community Center of Pittsburgh, the PERSAD Center and THRIVE of Southwest Pennsylvania, a nonprofit dedicated to helping schools reach out to often marginalized youth.

Education: Bachelor of Arts in psychology from Carlow University in 2012; pursuing a master’s degree in counseling at Chatham University

Background: Lucarelli organized the Proud Youth of Pittsburgh Convention that kicked off Nov. 21 at Chatham. Designed as a free meetup for LBGTQIA youth in middle and high school, the summit allowed them to share ideas about their diverse community while learning from experts about a wide range of social, political, medical and religious issues tied to LGBTQIA youngsters.

Quote: “Working with any marginalized population will reveal the struggles that they face in society. With LGBTQIA youths, they’re coming out at younger and younger ages, and that creates new challenges.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.