Newsmaker: Mark Roberts |

Newsmaker: Mark Roberts

Mark Roberts, 60, of Squirrel Hill received the Career Achievement Award from the Society for Medical Decision Making.

Noteworthy: Received the Career Achievement Award from the Society for Medical Decision Making

Age: 60

Residence: Squirrel Hill

Family: Wife, Eileen; sons, Benjamin Linkow and Matthew Roberts; daughter, Kate

Background: Roberts is a professor and chairman of the Department of Health Policy and Management at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, where he devises mathematical models to assess the impact of medical decisions. He has been a member of the Society for Medical Decision Making since 1984, served as its president from 2008 to 2009 and has held other leadership roles with the organization. He joined the faculty of Pitt School of Medicine in 1993 and has held the chair of Pitt Public Health’s Department of Health Policy and Management since 2010.

Education: Bachelor’s degree in economics, Harvard College, 1977; M.P.P. in public policy and health policy, Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, 1984; M.D., Tufts University, 1984

Quote: “I’ve bounced around a lot. My father used to say, ‘Mark studies decision sciences because he can’t make them.’ But he has always been very supportive.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.