ShareThis Page
Newsmaker: Robert Kraut |

Newsmaker: Robert Kraut

Mike Wereschagin
| Wednesday, February 17, 2016 11:00 p.m
Robert Kraut, 69, of Squirrel Hill was given a lifetime achievement award by the Association for Computing Machinery’s Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction.

Noteworthy: The Association for Computing Machinery’s Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction awarded Kraut its 2016 Lifetime Achievement in Research Award. The award recognizes Kraut’s decades of research into social computing, the effect of the Internet on personal relationships, how online communities function, and how those communities might be better designed.

Age: 69

Residence: Squirrel Hill

Occupation: Kraut is the Herbert A. Simon professor of Human-Computer Interaction at Carnegie Mellon University.

Background: He has been a member of the National Research Council’s Computer Science and Telecommunications Board since 2010, and was elected to the Association of Computing Machinery’s Computer-Human Interaction Academy in 2003 in recognition of his research.

Education: Kraut earned a Ph.D. in social psychology from Yale University in 1973, and a bachelor’s degree in English and social relations from Lehigh University in 1968.

Quote: “I am personally delighted and honored to receive this award. However, I also consider the award a testimonial to the wonderful collaborators and students I have worked with over the years at CMU. They are responsible for much of the research with which I’ve been involved and have made my research career so much fun.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.