ShareThis Page
Officials submit new application for federal Bus Rapid Transit funding |

Officials submit new application for federal Bus Rapid Transit funding


Officials have submitted a revised application seeking federal funding for Pittsburgh’s Bus Rapid Transit to connect Downtown and Oakland with electric buses.

Pittsburgh’s Urban Redevelopment Authority submitted the application last week seeking nearly $100 million from the Federal Transit Administration’s Small Starts program, said Adam Brandolph, a Port Authority spokesman.

The $195.5 million project will connect Downtown to Oakland on buses that operate in their own lanes along Fifth and Forbes avenues.

The authority expects to hear whether the FTA chose the project for funding in late winter or early spring, Brandolph said. Last year, the FTA made the announcement in February. The Pittsburgh project was not chosen but received a “high” rating overall.

It’s one of 33 project applications nationwide in the Small Starts Project Development Phase, according to an FTA web page .

In April, newly hired authority CEO Katharine Eagan Kelleman announced the authority would change its BRT plan so no bus routes would have service cuts.

The authority announced in May 2017 that, as a result of the project, several Mon Valley routes would lose nonstop service to Downtown. Additionally, transferring could come with a fee.

Many Mon Valley riders, who rely heavily on public transit, raised concerns about that plan, leading to the change.

Officials plan to start construction on the project in 2019 and to have it up and running by late 2021.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Theresa at 412-380-5669, [email protected] or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.