Archive

Overdose deaths in Allegheny County may have peaked, officials say | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Overdose deaths in Allegheny County may have peaked, officials say

Megan Guza
vndNarcan3101415
Erica Dietz | Trib Total Media
A naloxone nasal injection device

Allegheny County officials are considering a 12-percent increase in overdose deaths last year a win over previous years that saw far higher increases.

In a Monday afternoon press release, the county medical examiner said the final tally of overdose-related deaths in 2017 was 735. That’s 80 more deaths than 2016, which saw 655.

Dr. Karl Williams said data shows the overdose epidemic peaked in the fourth quarter of 2016, and each quarter has dropped progressively since then. Williams said there were 259 overdose deaths in the last three months of 2016.

“The numbers have dropped progressively since that point, with 133 being recorded for the last quarter of 2017,” he said. “There has also been a corresponding decrease in total autopsies processed by the office.”

Officials said overdose deaths are slowing because of access to Narcan, an overdose-reversal drug. They are getting it quicker into the hands of not only first responders, but drug users and their loved ones. They also pointed to a more collaborative effort among county departments, public safety agencies and community groups.

The release noted that fentanyl and its many analogues continued to increase last year, two years after the first – acetyl fentanyl – appeared in 33 toxicology reports in Allegheny County, according to the release.

“These analogues have been increasing in both number and variety for the past several years,” officials wrote in the release. “In 2017, they were documented in 168 cases and, for the first time, two of them were among the list of top 10 overdose drugs found.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.