Archive

ShareThis Page
Owner of former ice cream shop in McCandless to spend 20 to 40 years in prison for sexually abusing 2 girls | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Owner of former ice cream shop in McCandless to spend 20 to 40 years in prison for sexually abusing 2 girls

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, November 13, 2014 3:18 p.m
PtrHigginbotham111414
David Higginbotham

Two young girls stood before Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Donna Jo McDaniel on Thursday and told her how David Higginbotham, the man they once thought of as a grandfather, betrayed their trust and scarred them for years to come.

“He made me feel disgusting,” one of the girls, now 13, told the judge.

“He used me,” her sister, now 12, said as she wiped tears from her face.

The Tribune-Review does not identify victims of sexual assault or provide information that would lead to their identification.

“He violated their trust and understanding of the way the world should be,” their stepfather said. “He betrayed an obligation to safeguard our children from harm. … He does not deserve this court’s mercy. He does not deserve your leniency.”

McDaniel agreed, sentencing Higginbotham, 62, the former owner of a McCandless ice cream shop, to serve 20 to 40 years in prison for abusing the sisters during a five-year period, mostly inside his Marshall home.

Assistant District Attorney Lee Goldfarb had requested a sentence of 19 12 to 39 years.

Police said Higginbotham, a longtime friend who celebrated special occasions and holidays with the family, sexually abused the girls between April 2008 and August 2013, and told them they’d go to jail if they told anyone.

A jury in August convicted Higginbotham of a dozen counts, including two counts each of aggravated indecent assault of a child, unlawful contact with a minor and indecent exposure. They acquitted Higginbotham of three charges, including one count of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse and two counts of statutory sexual assault.

Higginbotham said nothing Thursday as he stood before McDaniel in jail-issue red pants and a long-sleeve white shirt.

“The judge lit him up today,” said Phil DiLucente, Higginbotham’s defense lawyer, who said he would appeal.

“He believes he did not do any of these acts he’s accused of,” DiLucente said.

The girls’ mother said the sexual abuse tore their family apart.

“I’m angry for what he did to them physically and emotionally,” she said. “I’m angry for the hours spent in counseling, the unexplained headaches, the insomnia. … I am angry for the five years he stole from my family.”

McDaniel told her she should be angry.

“It may never be as good as it was, but it will get better,” she said.

Police arrested Higginbotham at Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream and Yogurt, a shop he owned in the McCandless Crossing shopping center, on Nov. 22, 2013, a week after the older sister told her parents about the abuse. She told them her sister also was abused.

Sixty people wrote McDaniel letters on Higginbotham’s behalf, including his wife, Kathy, a family and consumer sciences instructor in North Allegheny Intermediate High School; his children; and several members of North Park Baptist Church in McCandless.

“He has served the Lord in our church above reproach in many areas and his involvement has benefitted not only our church but our community as well,” read a letter from Steven Arredondo, the church’s pastor.

The girls’ stepfather disagreed.

“There’s a special place in hell for people like David Higginbotham,” he said.

Adam Brandolph is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or abrandolph@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.