ShareThis Page
Pair of registered sex offenders busted for violating probation |

Pair of registered sex offenders busted for violating probation

Tony LaRussa
| Saturday, December 9, 2017 10:21 a.m
Alexander Taylor
Michael Henchell

A pair of registered sex offenders wanted for violating the conditions of their probation and parole were arrested by Allegheny County sheriff’s deputies within hours of warrants being issued, authorities announced.

Alexander Taylor, 28, of McKees Rocks is required to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life as a result of a 2010 guilty plea on charges of indecent assault of a person 13 or younger and corruption of a minor.

He was arrested hours after sheriff’s deputies set up a surveillance operation near his apartment in the 300 block of Ella Street in McKees Rocks.

Michael Henchell, 21, of East Pittsburgh, who has a 25-year registration requirement under Megan’s Law, was arrested in the Allentown section of Pittsburgh, where he had known ties to residents living there.

He was taken into custody after sheriff’s deputies spotted him at a home in the 900 block of Excelsior Street.

Henchell is required to register as a sex offender because of a 2015 conviction for indecent assault by forcible compulsion, corruption of minors and making terroristic threats.

Both men are in the Allegheny County Jail without bond.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-772-6368, or via Twitter @TonyLaRussaTrib.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.