ShareThis Page
Peduto proposes major reorganization of Bureau of Building Inspection |

Peduto proposes major reorganization of Bureau of Building Inspection

James Knox | Trib Total Media
Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto gives his 'State of the City' address Monday, Nov. 10, 2014, as Pittsburgh City Council president Bruce Kraus looks on in the City Council Chambers in the CIty County Building, Downtown.
James Knox | Trib Total Media
Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto gives his 'State of the City' address Monday, Nov. 10, 2014, in the City Council Chambers in the CIty County Building, Downtown.
James Knox | Trib Total Media
Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto gives his 'State of the City' address Monday, Nov. 10, 2014, as Pittsburgh City Council President Bruce Kraus looks on in the City Council Chambers in the CIty County Building Downtown.
James Knox | Trib Total Media
Mayor Bill Peduto delivers his 'State of the City' address on Monday, Nov. 10, 2014, in the City-County Building, Downtown.

Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto’s plan Monday to split the controversial Bureau of Building Inspection from the Department of Public Safety exposes a rift between two of the mayor’s top recruits.

Peduto said during his “State of the City” address Monday that the move is designed to streamline permitting and ensure the “highest levels of building safety and performance.” His office denied that Public Safety Director Stephen A. Bucar and BBI head Maura Kennedy cannot work together.

But a City Council member and other administration sources said the two Peduto appointees have had problems for months.

“She does not want to accept the authority of the Public Safety director, which really scares me, because you can’t have a public safety emergency with two people trying to run the show,” said Councilwoman Darlene Harris of the North Side, the only council member to oppose Kennedy’s hiring in March. “This cannot be good for the city of Pittsburgh.”

Administration sources confirmed there has been friction between the two.

Kennedy declined to comment.

Bucar said he could neither confirm nor deny problems with Kennedy. He said he doesn’t have a problem with the mayor’s plan if BBI maintains a focus on public safety.

Bucar, who also oversees the fire department, police, emergency medical services and animal control, said bureau chiefs sometimes disagree with his directives. “But we work through them in a professional manner,” he said.

Peduto spokesman Tim McNulty said, “Maura is doing a great job at BBI. That’s why this department is being elevated. I don’t know anything about any kind of rift.”

Kennedy, who held a similar position in Philadelphia, arrived in Pittsburgh with a reputation for cleaning up blighted properties.

Peduto’s chief of staff, Kevin Acklin, said the city’s permitting system is archaic and split between city departments.

Making BBI a separate department will make it easier for developers and residents to get permits for such things as new construction and trash bins.

“It’s all about reducing the friction of doing business with the city,” Acklin said. “Right now … it’s difficult to do business with the city. You have to know the ropes.”

It’s not because of a rift, he said.

Council has long been critical of BBI, saying the department is slow to react to code violations in neighborhoods and takes too long to issue permits.

Controller Michael Lamb said he agrees with streamlining permitting, but the city can do that without breaking off BBI.

“I’m concerned about taking the focus away from what is our primary responsibility, which is to protect people,” he said.

BBI, among other duties, conducts regular inspections at new construction sites to ensure that safety code regulations are being followed. It does the same for building demolitions.

Under the mayor’s proposal, which is subject to council approval, BBI would operate as its own agency, reporting to Peduto and council. Its name would change to the Department of Permits, Licenses and Inspections.

Peduto said BBI and the departments of Planning and Zoning, along with the Urban Redevelopment Authority and the Housing Authority, would form a Neighborhood Reinvestment Alliance.

Harris questioned Kennedy’s qualifications for the $100,889 position early on, noting that she lacks a degree in engineering or architecture and 10 years of experience, all of which were listed as minimum requirements in the BBI chief’s job description.

“I do not support BBI leaving Public Safety,” she said. “It’s a Public Safety function.”

Kennedy, 33, has a bachelor’s degree from Cornell University in government and is pursuing a Master of Business Administration from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Peduto administration officials have said she completed a state certification to administer building codes, also required in the job description.

Under Kennedy’s supervision, BBI inspectors got email capability for the first time, along with laptops and smartphones.

When Peduto visited BBI offices in July, Kennedy reported that building permits were up by 16 percent over 2013 because of an increase in commercial and residential construction.

Employees told the mayor that morale is low in some quarters, but administrators are working on improvements.

Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.