ShareThis Page
Peregrine falcon chick hatches at Downtown’s Gulf Tower |

Peregrine falcon chick hatches at Downtown’s Gulf Tower

Mary Ann Thomas
| Wednesday, April 19, 2017 2:12 p.m
National Aviary Falcon Cam Gulf Tower
Several pairs of peregrine falcons nest atop buildings in downtown Pittsburgh.

Pittsburgh Gulf Tower peregrines Dori and Louie welcomed their first chick of the season on Wednesday morning.

The newly hatched, fuzzy white falcon apparently had a voracious appetite close to noon, when it dined on what looked like bird nuggets offered by one its parents.

The pair has a total of five eggs, most of which are expected to hatch throughout Wednesday, according to Kate St. John of Greenfield, the main volunteer monitor for Pittsburgh area peregrine falcons for the Pennsylvania Game Commission.

“These birds are experienced and very good parents,” St. John said. “It looks like it’s going to be a great season.”

Dori and Louie are in their eighth year of rearing young.

Peregrine falcons first nested at the Gulf Tower at Grant Street and Seventh Avenue, Downtown, in 1991. For a time, they moved on from the tower and built nests in buildings along Third Avenue and near Point Park University.

Another peregrine falcon pair, Hope and Terzo, are awaiting the hatch of their first chick, which is expected as early as Sunday at the Cathedral of Learning in Oakland. The pair has four eggs.

The peregrine falcon still is endangered in Pennsylvania.

There are eight known active peregrine nest sites in southwestern Pennsylvania: Gulf Tower, Cathedral of Learning, Tarentum Bridge, Graff Bridge in Kittanning, Monaca East Rochester Bridge in Beaver County, Neville Island I-79 Bridge, the McKees Rocks Bridge and the Westinghouse Bridge in North Versailles, according to St. John.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. She can be reached at 724-226-4691, or on twitter @MaThomas_Trib

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.