ShareThis Page
Pitt business school dean to step down |

Pitt business school dean to step down

Debra Erdley
| Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:54 p.m
Jasmine Goldband | Trib Total Media
John T. Delaney is stepping down from his post as dean of the University of Pittsburgh's College of Business Administration and Katz Graduate School of Business.

John Delaney takes his commitment to change and innovation seriously.

Delaney, 58, of Point Breeze said that’s why he is stepping aside after eight years as dean of the University of Pittsburgh’s College of Business Administration and Katz Graduate School of Business.

“I believe there is a natural amount of time in which you can accomplish your agenda as a leader. The real challenge at the end is to step aside and let someone else bring new ideas. It made sense for me to say this is the time. It allows the university to make the changes it needs,” Delaney said.

He plans to return to a faculty post at Pitt as soon as the university names his replacement.

Audrey Murrell, an associate dean of the College of Business, was a member of the search committee that lured Delaney to Pitt from Michigan State University. She described Delaney’s tenure as “transformational” for the college.

Associates say his emphasis on real-world experience both at the graduate and undergraduate levels and the growing importance of international business was critical to Pitt’s climb in business school rankings in recent years.

Last year, the Economist ranked Pitt’s MBA program first in the United States in terms of return on investment. The rating was based on a metric that had a 41.9 percent return on tuition of $57,716 in increased earnings one year after graduation.

“That’s huge,” said Murrell. “We’ve had a couple of schools want to come and look at what we’re doing.”

University officials said they are assembling a search committee to nominate Delaney’s successor.

Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.