Archive

ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh City Council to consider new sprinkler regulations for high-rise buildings | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh City Council to consider new sprinkler regulations for high-rise buildings

270432ptrPittsburghSkyline2FILE
Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
The Pittsburgh skyline at sunset on Monday, June 22, 2015

Legislation will be introduced to Pittsburgh City Council on Tuesday that would require all high-rise buildings to have automatic sprinkler systems.

The sprinkler requirements would be especially effective for older buildings that were built before sprinklers were common, Pittsburgh Bureau of Fire Chief Darryl Jones said in the release.

One resident died and 100 other were displaced during a fire at the 110-year-old Midtown Towers Downtown last year.

“If Midtown Towers had sprinklers, it would have been a non-event,” Jones said in the release.

State building code requires building owners to have 12 years to comply with the regulations, a city news release said. The legislation would make the changes to the Pittsburgh fire code.

Sprinklers will be required in buildings that are 75 feet or more, which typically means six stories, the release said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.