ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh closer to taking 11 properties by eminent domain for Banksville project |

Pittsburgh closer to taking 11 properties by eminent domain for Banksville project


Pittsburgh City Council on Wednesday advanced a bill that would authorize the city to take 11 properties along Banksville Road through eminent domain to make way for a $2.2 million intersection improvement project.

The city would pay five owners of the 11 parcels a total of $188,700 for taking the property at Wenzell Avenue and Carnahan Street, according to the bill.

Work includes widening of Wenzell, replacement and widening of a bridge over Carnahan, stream bank stabilization, signal upgrades, repairs to stairs paralleling Wenzell and other pedestrian access improvements.

Work is expected to begin next spring and last for about a year. Drivers on Wenzell and Carnahan will not be able to access Banksville Road during construction.

City officials said they would take steps to make sure customers have access to Banksville Express Printing, a private business. Owner Rick Ozanick previously complained that the work would block handicap parking spaces and the entrance to his lot.

Officials described the intersection as a hazard for drivers and pedestrians alike.

Pittsburgh has been considering the project since 1992, according to the Department of Mobility and Infrastructure.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or on [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.